Eddie Brown, investigative journalist for the FW Weekly, uncovers some improprieties amongst several Tarrant County District Attorneys. Eddie shares several cases, one personal, that outline a lack of oversight amongst those charged with upholding the law. Fascinating!
roxo media house welcome back to fortitude folks JW
0:07
Wilson with my co-host Brinton Payne lasso youth uh brought to you of course by our friends at cap text Bank our old
0:13
friend Eddie Brown is back here today our investigative journalist buddy from the fourth weekly
0:19
last time he was here he exposed some issues related to the Tarrant County judges presiding over some cases where
0:25
they weren’t appropriately certified ones correct today though Brinton some
0:31
Tarrant County Prosecutors been doing some things maybe they shouldn’t be doing fair to say fair to say welcome to
0:37
the show back to show Eddie Brown we appreciate the time let’s get into it hang on real quick Eddie have you ever I mean what if what if we get in trouble
0:43
and Eddie’s saying this about the prosecutors we’re going to be like looked at In a Different Light I feel
0:49
good I’m unconscious it’s clear don’t get into any legal trouble you don’t get you won’t get caught up in the system they’re easier said than done easier
0:56
said than done um I want to mention all the stories I’m going to talk about today have been
1:01
published at the weekly so uh it’s all stuff that’s already out there and we’ve already vetted it and whatnot but um I
1:07
wanted to start by talking about prosecutors and um amongst all the different levels of the Criminal Justice
1:13
System um they receive routinely the least amount of scrutiny and I was thinking about that um I think
1:20
there’s really two reasons and I say scrutiny from the public and the media right they’re very rarely mentioned if
1:25
they are it’s just you know they’re Prosecuting this in that case um I think right now there’s a lot of public attention on policing and so I
1:33
think there’s a kind of disproportionate uh you know amount of attention being paid to uh policing basically we all see
1:39
that every day um secondly I think uh you know popular culture uh think Law and Order you know
1:45
movies um that portray prosecutors um are almost always uh they do in a way
1:51
that kind of reveres the position and through my work at the weekly and I enjoy looking at the criminal justice
1:57
system I think it’s important for folks to remember that just like police just like you and me uh these are humans and
2:03
they have um emotions and intrinsic biases just like everyone else and while their job
2:09
is to be on a neutral Arbiter of Justice
2:15
um they’re still humans and um according to the Washington Post around 30 percent of wrongful convictions are the results
2:22
of prosecutorial misconduct so that could be uh withholding evidence that would help the defense that could be
2:28
outright lying during the trial um prosecutors are there to win right so they’re there to to win um those figures
2:35
are they know what their winning percentage is and that’s you know one criteria that’s used they would deny it
2:41
but that is one criteria that’s used to promote them and whatnot so I have uh five stories I want to share today about
2:48
uh prosecutors and it’ll kind of shed light on kind of a more realistic
2:53
nuanced look at the role they play in Tarrant County I’m going to start with our top
2:59
prosecutor who’s a top prosecutor in Tarrant County right now Sharon Wilson’s gone Phil Sorrels Phil Sorrels yeah just took
3:08
office and he um was the GM though right like he doesn’t actually prosecute he’s
3:15
considered the the district attorney everyone else uh you won’t see him in court Prosecuting you’re correct that’s a good point but he is a district
3:21
attorney he is the top prosecutor he decides uh has say on which cases are prosecuted and whatnot under him are a
3:29
large number of assistant District Attorneys these are the folks who you will see in the courtroom actually Prosecuting the cases so it’s an
3:34
important distinction he’s a long time uh was a long time County criminal judge and um last year I talked to a general
3:41
named gentleman named Brendan Jones so this story has to deal with Phil Sorrels as time as judged in 2021 right before
3:48
he ran but it’s important because Phil Sorrels is now the top uh district
3:54
attorney over this same case and he arguably created this um this case fabricated this case
4:01
so Brandon Jones um he’s a young man married um has a stepdaughter and um some family
4:10
court issues came up expelled over into the criminal court system this happens fairly often someone makes allegations
4:16
um there were a lot of police you know someone meaning his exes his wife’s ex made some allegations and was sending
4:22
police over constantly uh harassing him and so his his family went into hiding and he refused to tell a family court
4:30
judge where the location was and so that you know that leads to jail time that led to him being uh what he would say
4:36
was you know falsely arrested and they said he was resisting arrest which he denied so that whole family Corridor
4:42
deal landed Brendan in Criminal Courts number 10.
4:47
on October 4th 2021 and when he arrived his his account of the story is that um
4:54
when he was talking to judge sorel’s uh Sorrels took offense with the fact that
4:59
Jones was he said being polite but but also criticizing the fact that he was
5:04
having to be there uh without any without having committed any discernible crime and so Phil according to Brendan and I
5:12
have some documentation here which we’ll go over um said that Phil looked at him and said well I guess you’re not it’s present
5:18
which means he was going to issue a bench warrant for non-appearance um which they do if you don’t show up
5:24
for court those who have bench warrant and Brennan realized what Phil was verbally threatening and he went
5:30
downstairs with several witnesses and signed an affidavit in the county clerk’s office and I have a copy of that
5:36
here that’s that same day and time swearing that he was present in courts and there’s a witness and it is
5:42
certified by the office of the county clerk which is next to which is on the second floor of the Tim Curry building
5:48
and it’s interesting if you look at the um the bench warrants said they called roll at 9 49 A.M
5:57
which is interesting because they would have called roll at 9 00 a.m that’s when that’s when you have to be seated you
6:04
have to be presents and they call a roll one time you’re either there or you aren’t right either on time and you’re
6:09
present or you’re not for them to call roll again almost an hour later is very
6:15
suspect and it it is um it appears that it was done as soon
6:20
as Brennan left to to catch him you know not being in court and so he has this
6:26
outstanding bench warrants that has not allowed him to he’s in hiding um he hasn’t been he has not been able
6:32
to see his wife and daughter because of this and um like I said he can’t get his life
6:39
back together and he hopes that because um this order was this whole uh bench
6:46
warrant was ordered by Phil Sorrels who is now the top prosecutor he argues that the D.A cannot ethically prosecute this
6:53
case so we have an example I think a lot of people think whenever a prosecutor is Prosecuting something it’s
6:59
a an actual crime and you know B uh ethically a crime right we’ll talk about some things that were technically crimes
7:06
that prosecutors have gone after that arguably should never have been prosecuted um so that’s the first example do you guys have any questions
7:12
on that yeah so why why is he fighting this I mean it’s clear he has evidence that he was there
7:18
during the time he was really not there why didn’t does he have an attorney I’m guessing can his attorney just prove
7:26
this really quickly to be a falsehood yeah I don’t know if he has an attorney he probably will seek that he is going
7:33
to have people speak at the Commissioner’s Court coming up in the near future to make this very public we of course we published a story on this
7:39
Phil did not respond to our question our request for comments um but it seems if if what Brennan is
7:46
saying is is true and it’s backed up by what I’ve read and witnessed statements
7:51
um it seems absurd that the D.A would still be prosecuting this case it’s very you know it’s very clear just based on
7:57
the government’s own documents there’s some really weird things going going on here so sure so yes it would be it would be the role of a of a defense attorney
8:04
to talk to the DA’s office um but this is a very high profile case that’s probably
8:09
um embarrassing for the DA’s office so in these situations what I found and I’ll share some stories are very similar
8:15
they’ll kind of double down on being wrong about something out of Pride and
8:20
spite sure because it’s embarrassing so unfortunately in these cases you’ll kind
8:25
of see the District Attorney’s Office kind of dig their heels in they maybe wait a couple years before they drop the charges finally which is horrible yeah
8:31
I’ll put bench warrant like that like what is uh what’s the what time that
8:36
this other guy would have to like is that pretty significant that bench warrant like that if he were to be
8:42
arrested if he showed up to uh it was arrested he would he would serve
8:48
um I’m sure not not like a year in jail but he would be in jail for for a while so it’s a serious thing I’m not sure
8:55
exactly what it is um month or a week or something in jail it’s enough that he doesn’t want to show about the Tarrant County Fair uh and and
9:02
the DA’s office could drop this um instantly where do you get access to these stories you go and comb through
9:07
like how did you like this one would tip you got a dip or something he must have reached out to me I think I think
9:14
someone reads A lot of these cases are people reaching out to me then I’ll I’ll meet them and um you know can you meet
9:20
him yeah I did meet him this guy you can’t tell us where because no he’s not
9:25
in Tarrant County right now either way so but at that time do you know where he is now Eddie I do but I guess that’s all
9:31
right yeah yeah but you’re you’re in contact with them I’m in contact with him yes and I met him and even when I met him of course anytime he shows up in
9:38
public it’s you know it’s it puts his safety his Liberty I should say uh and possibly his safety in in Jeopardy uh
9:45
but yeah he reached out to me and what I do with these Pro with these stories is I talk to them and one of the first
9:50
things I ask is for them to back up everything they say with with documents and he was one that was very good he
9:55
literally had a pile of he’d been collecting you know just like I do he knows how to ask for stuff and that’s
10:01
where I’m like okay this guy’s he’s backing up what he’s saying and then you continue talking talk to other Witnesses okay it’s very consistent and then you
10:07
reach the point like okay it’s I would I’ll put my name I’ll put my name behind it it’s very credible at that point it’s like fair so the one thing though you
10:15
said is that the it appear it seemed to me maybe I made this assumption that the
10:20
wife and the wife was making the accusations I’m sorry I started it to begin with but the wife’s ex-husband
10:27
okay yes because then you were saying that he couldn’t see his wife and family or whatever right and then you were like
10:33
wait why would he want to see them if they’re the ones who kind of no no they didn’t I mean his wife and stepdaughter
10:39
didn’t do anything wrong they were terrified by all the uh police uh resulting police raids and Brendan’s
10:45
arrest and all this kind of stuff and so they’ve just kind of from what I understand they’ve gone into hiding for their own safety okay it’s a real tragic
10:51
story yeah next story so um this one I’m gonna be kind of brief on this next one
10:57
because the the last three I think are really really important but the idea
11:02
that people who are you know in jail or being prosecuted they must be bad guys there’s a gentleman named Manuel Mata
11:08
who’s a local citizen journalist so he’s a cop Watcher uh it’s a very popular thing on YouTube now to see people going
11:14
out and videotaping police and government buildings so he does this and so uh his job
11:20
um invariably offends you know local police and
11:25
um and so he’s made he’s made enemies with um with law enforcement and I’ll give you two examples of two times he was
11:32
arrested while doing his uh his cop watching one he was uh this is all live streams you can literally watch these
11:39
interactions in Fort Worth uh one he’s walking to a gas station and a fourth police officer Bengal approaches him
11:45
Bengal clearly recognizes Manuel Mata um and says that mod is interfering with
11:51
a police investigation well way in the background about a football fields uh length away is uh the police had pulled
11:58
over somebody right mod is trying to get to the gas station he said he said it’s going to get uh some cigarettes and this officer is
12:05
going up and saying no you cannot walk on this sidewalk and then eventually um are you filming it yeah yeah and he
12:12
said he there’s a lot of this sometimes he’s filming just for his own self to uh safety he wasn’t even like you know
12:17
trying to cop watch that more he just if he sees a cop approaching he turns on his camera and a lot of people are learning you have to do this
12:24
um either to protect herself or to later exonerate yourself right and so that video is is very clear but he was
12:30
arrested and he spent a month in jail for that and you can watch the video and see that he didn’t commit any crime whatsoever
12:36
um another incident he was in the turn Appraisal District uh building and was there as a citizen journalist
12:42
filming the events and again you know Tad some of these places
12:47
um they don’t like what he does so they booted him out around June and as
12:52
they’re pushing him out they allege that he assaulted one of the officers um again it’s videotaped both from his
12:58
point of view and another gentleman’s point of view and the security cameras I’ve watched it all and he does he doesn’t hit anyone
13:04
so but he’s again you know rested and he spends another month in jail he’s currently facing several misdemeanor
13:11
charges um all stemming from his work uh as a First Amendment auditor someone who’s
13:17
working in the public interest but he does piss off law enforcement and District Attorneys very often work very
13:24
closely with law enforcement yeah with law enforcements they would say that they don’t uh but that’s not true they
13:31
they’re they’re basic they you know they’re basically friends they know each other and so that’s I wanted to mention his name because you know he’s he’s you
13:38
know these things can last for years before they they resolve these cases but he’s someone who the community looks up
13:44
to and respects and uh the local criminal justice system has targeted him uh purely because he embarrasses
13:52
um local officials public officials so Emmanuel Mata okay um yeah does he have
13:58
a YouTube site at uh manual m-a-n-u-e-l uh matz I believe you can
14:05
find him yeah pretty popular some of this stuff is I’ve seen a couple of these over the over the over time but it’s it’s impressive what he’s doing to
14:12
oh okay I I feel like there’s a there’s a place for this in the world it makes me nervous yeah obviously for that
14:17
reason but yeah yes people do this now that are trying to catch keep the cops honest and obviously we know cops are
14:24
relatively good in that regard but there are some out there that maybe do some things that this guy’s looking for so
14:31
what you know what’s your take on that I can venture to guess where you’re gonna go on this but it you know but are we
14:38
getting to a point where you know people change when they’re on camera we got a camera here I’m asking you things maybe
14:46
a little bit differently than I would if we were just sitting around having a cup of coffee or something like that but
14:51
um are we are we policing ourselves too much because you know that most likely
14:58
the officers are like I’m getting filmed I don’t want to be film you know that kind of thing and so playing the other
15:04
side of it is it is it necessary to just be filming all the time you know everywhere and
15:11
everything and some people that’s their lives right that’s their livelihood and things like that and going and finding
15:17
um exciting and Sensational thing you being from the media are we getting too Sensational you know about all of this
15:24
stuff are we selling our souls for a little bit of excitement you know uh what do you think yeah the uh the
15:30
citizen auditor the citizen journalists movements um it’s hard to categorize them as as uh
15:37
they’re not unified you have some people who do it very carefully you have some people who are very outlandish and so
15:42
it’s it’s it’s hard to um talk about it without admitting that um there are
15:48
people that do a better job than others right a more responsible job at it but at its core it’s it’s the idea that if
15:54
if we do not assert certain rights we will lose them and I think that’s a fair
16:00
um assertion and I think when you watch these videos and you see government officials totally unaware that we yes we
16:06
have every right to be inside public buildings filming we do that’s a that is a constitutional right to see how many
16:14
elected officials government staff cops do not understand that I think they need
16:20
to learn that and I think if if we allow that to be eroded we’re going to find
16:25
ourselves in a position where government thinks that we work for them and I think that’s that’s that’s the the battle that
16:33
that they’re involved in does all that recording though push things to a darker place in your opinion I’m sure it upsets
16:40
um and you can tell you’re right you know to your point it does um when you put a camera in front of the cop’s face it you can tell it makes them agitated
16:46
right they don’t like it um but I think you know people citizen Auditors would argue that it’s
16:53
their job to be the adult in the room and I think it’s the same way actually with Phil Sorrels because you know when
17:00
we published a story I saw a comments someone said how dare they talk back you know this person talk back to a judge or
17:05
you know they they invited this you know retaliation and I don’t mind you know saying that uh it’s not it’s not the
17:11
judge’s job to um do anything but be an adult and I don’t care what that
17:19
person says unless they’re threatening you which Brandon Jones wasn’t um if they’re upsetting you as a
17:25
government official you need to put those emotions behind you because your job is you’re a public servant and your
17:31
job is to either Minister the law or enforce the law or you know as processors prosecutors do
17:39
um enforce a law in a courtroom so I mean yes it gets people upset but I think we
17:46
need to understand that the burden is on the people that we’re paying as taxpayers to be the responsible adult at
17:52
all times it’s hard though because we’re at a place sorry just something yeah yeah yeah yeah uh we’re we’re doing all
17:58
kinds of things I recently saw the mayor of our you know our great mayor in this great City talk about
18:04
um some of the things she had to go through and making the decision to run again and things like that and it’s just
18:10
one of those deals where we’re just getting more and more primitive in our ways and it’s harder and harder I think
18:17
for people no matter who they are where they are to keep that emotional restraint especially if they’ve got a
18:23
cell phone camera in their Facebook keep going on the street fair point so I want to say most of the time for uh did you
18:30
like my opinion there no no it’s it’s a it’s an important perspective
18:35
um to bring that you know sometimes I mean I’m not going to be an apologist for every citizen journalist if they’re
18:41
going out there being Reckless and it’s exciting things I’m not I am not advocating for that but a lot of them do
18:46
with the right intentions I would say most and do with the right intentions um I want to spend the last part of our
18:52
conversation talking about a prosecutor in Tarrant County he’s one of the top prosecutors there of the white collar
18:57
crimes division um his name is Lloyd witchell and his job is to investigate corrupt public
19:06
officials and these three stories I have would say that arguably Lloyd witchell
19:12
is one of the if not the most corrupt public official uh in Tarrant County so
19:17
it’s not without irony that his job is to investigate um why call our crimes I’ll just say so
19:23
I’m gonna give you three stories um what an introduction yeah what an introduction so I’ve got now that well
19:29
we’ll just start the show at this point um I’m gonna go chronologically because there are three stories he uh cases he
19:35
prosecuted um that are very interesting um the oldest one it wasn’t that long
19:40
ago um were these two South Lake school board members in early 2021 I don’t know
19:46
if you remember these two school board members were indicted for violating the openings meetings act open meetings acts
19:52
and I’ve spent a lot of time investigating this story and I was nominated for a journalism award
19:59
um Tarrant County has never prosecuted an opens meetings act violations in the history I requested copies from the
20:05
county of any example than prosecuting um it’s very rarely prosecuted in the
20:11
state of Texas because it’s a hard case to prosecute it’s it’s um you know it’s it’s it’s a bureaucratic it’s an important law but
20:17
it’s kind of bureaucratic and it elected officials understandably might make mistakes or not you know comply with
20:23
levels it’s not a very it’s not as clear-cut as other crimes or it’s not like theft uh so anyway
20:28
um the DA’s office had never prosecuted this case this type of crime I should say uh in its history
20:36
um the timing of it happening rights as the elections were occurring for the school board was interesting and then I
20:42
realized that it was never investigated by the police so typically what happens
20:48
with um charges usually at local law enforce enforcement will do the initial investigation and they’ll ask the
20:54
District Attorney’s office to accept the case so unprecedented prosecutions have always kind of caught my attention so
21:01
um if if a DA’s office is Prosecuting something a type of crime for the first
21:07
time in its history that’s that’s always of Interest right because there’s usually a reason that they do not
21:12
there’s a reason that the this attorney’s office did not prosecute the opening meeting act for the past I don’t
21:18
know whatever 80 90 years the office has been in existence maybe longer um and there’s usually a reason for that
21:24
a lot of large organizations that very Brazen brazenly
21:29
um keep the public out of important meetings and this was an
21:34
example where two board members were texting each other trying to resolve a very painful moment in that City’s
21:42
history as it came to terms with um just rampant racism within that City so
21:48
these are two board members who um were trying to heal the community but they
21:54
became used as political political Pawns in an election that ultimately got our County Judge elected
22:00
um Lord witchell was also involved in a case of a former Justice of the piece
22:06
named Jackie Wright and this was another unprecedented uh prosecution this time
22:12
uh Lloyd whitchell prosecuted someone for not updating their homestead
22:18
exemption so uh Jackie is an elderly lady she
22:25
did not she found out I should say because I don’t know what she did or didn’t know but she found out that her
22:30
home did not have the proper homestead exemption because she rents she has a couple homes that she’s renting um so in 2019
22:37
um she contacted Tad noted the error brought it to their attention and then paid the
22:43
money that she owed but what she didn’t know is at that same time as she’s doing that the District Attorney’s Office uh
22:49
is investigating her um and then after she pays the arrears
22:55
um she is indicted on these felony charges for uh what was vaguely called public corruption at the time and so um
23:01
what in talking to Jack and her family um she had made enemies with some
23:06
powerful folks um JD Wells um uh JD Johnson apologized and uh who’s
23:14
the commissioner at the time and Jody Johnson who is the Constable at the time and some other Republican operatives and
23:20
so she maintains that uh they want her out of office and so it’s important to understand
23:26
um not updating your homestead exemption is not a criminal act there’s no penal
23:33
code violation in Texas for um you know forgetting to update your your um your homes exemption it’s a
23:40
civil matter I wouldn’t think so yeah it’s a civil matter they don’t come arrest you they don’t throw you in jail it’s not a felony it’s a civil matter so
23:46
if they find out if tear the president finds out you haven’t paid your uh money they contact you and you pay your money
23:52
you have to pay it but it’s it’s not it’s never given to the fourth PD or something and
23:57
so the District Attorney’s office they were in an interesting situation because they had caught her doing something that
24:03
literally was not a crime but they had already indicted her so they needed to
24:09
come up with something to charge her with and what they did was they came up with this idea of government tampering
24:14
of a document um so that’s that’s the charge she eventually went to trial for
24:20
um early last year and I want to emphasize we think of tampering with the government document and we’ve actually
24:26
found public officials who’ve done this uh Jeff law you know with Tad
24:31
but I imagine someone you know breaking into a building pulling out a file uh getting a Sharpie you know altering
24:38
something um and to be clear Jackie never tampered with any document this was a document
24:44
that existed in Tad’s office right and whenever she notified them about it they
24:51
updated the document so it’s it was really it was a real stretch to say that this old lady forgetting to update her
24:57
exemption uh was tampering with the documents I also found out from uh tads
25:02
on records turn Appraisal District that’s at any given time in Tarrant County there are thousands of people who
25:09
have not updated their homestead exemption uh maybe their parent died and they moved into the house and they’re still enjoying that tax break it happens
25:15
they’re not supposed to do that but it happens or someone you know uses it um misuses it to save money you know or
25:22
it’s just an accident I don’t think the District Attorney’s Office District Attorney’s office is
25:28
going to indict all those people with felonies so anyway um they didn’t die Jackie and I went to
25:35
the trial because I was I was blown away by the um the basics of the case you know this
25:41
lady had forgotten to update her humps exemption and she was arrested and charged with a felony and I knew the
25:46
background I knew a lot about the Johnson family I knew the kind of the political Intrigue you know Precinct four
25:53
um it all was very consistent uh with what we found and ironically JD’s office was is or was incredibly corrupt I mean
26:01
he would use government materials and and resources and employees for his personal campaign and it’s all
26:07
documented um but he was never charged with anything right so if you’re part of the old boy club you can pretty much do
26:14
anything get away with it but if you if you become enemies with the old boy club you get thrown in jail
26:20
um unfortunately Jackie um was found guilty you have this I was
26:25
found guilty of the the charges and she’s currently appealing her case and the judge in front of that sorry the
26:32
judge presiding over that case uh Was Daryl Coffey so that’s what got me following uh the retired judges and
26:39
looking into uh false uh assignments as a senior judge all the stuff that has happened
26:45
um in in the intervening uh almost a year was because of Jackie’s case and I also want to mention the number two
26:51
prosecutor at the DA’s office is Rob Catalano and he recused himself from
26:56
Jackie’s case but was still present there during the trial and I’ve asked
27:02
him he’s never answered the question why did he recuse himself from the case and bring in and bringing in this bogus
27:07
retired judge who had no oath of office on file and he was never a senior judge and so anyways now we’ve talked about
27:13
Phil we’ve talked about Rob Catalano one more story about Lloyd whitchell um
27:19
last September um I was found not guilty of harassment and by a jury and so um I was this is a
27:28
personal story Lloyd witchell was the prosecutor in my case and you know long story short
27:36
I’m finally out of this family court reunification process
27:42
um these false charges were used to try to keep me from seeing my daughter a lot of times people will make up stuff to to
27:48
skew the the family court process and so that’s what happened with me
27:53
um 12 13 phone calls unanswered phone calls I had made to um a man who was hiding my child in his
28:00
house was used as an alleged criminal offense um and that was also partly contrived by
28:07
the District Attorney’s Office whose good friends who maintains close connections with my daughter’s maternal
28:12
family right so I’m fully exonerated from that but um in the three years that I was facing
28:18
these bogus charges uh Lloyd witchell was Sharon Wilson I should say placed Lloyd witchell on my case so
28:26
the white-collar crimes top prosecutor was placed on my Class B misdemeanor
28:33
charge as a sign of we have power over you now
28:39
all right so I’ve by that point I’ve written a lot of scathing things about Sharon Wilson and Lloyd witchell and so
28:46
the whole idea that that he would be the one over my case and he tried his darndest in court
28:51
um to get me found guilty because it would have been a blemish on my career and it would have been payback
28:57
um and he and he honestly lost his temp he was very clear he lost his temper during the trial and made up a lot of
29:03
things fabricated a lot of things to do anything he could to find me guilty and he ultimately lost
29:08
um but I want to read a letter and maybe this will be the last thing we do because I know we’re running close on time this kind of summarizes the
29:14
situation that I was in and I sent this letter to the the District Attorney’s
29:20
Office a few weeks before my trial just to put them on notice about how absurd
29:26
that what they were doing was so here’s the letter that they have on record
29:31
I am filing this letter so the District Attorney’s Office cannot feign ignorance about the actions of D.A Sharon Wilson
29:37
and assistant district attorney Lloyd witchell in the coming weeks the intentional placement of which will over
29:44
my harassment trial is an overt Act of aggression and intimidation on the part
29:49
of Wilson and Mitchell and a possible violation of section 3902 abuse of
29:55
official office which explicitly Outlaws the use of office to harm or defraud
30:00
another or Texas Penal Code 3903 which prohibits an official from using their
30:07
office to mistreat an individual at ish you are more than a dozen articles published by the fourth weekly
30:13
that have undoubtedly maligned whistle’s reputation many of those articles were written by myself and I am the co-author of many of
30:20
the editorials that have similarly reported on malfeasance on the part of the D.A of D.A Wilson for three years my
30:28
case which involves unanswered phone calls to a middle-aged man who is hiding my daughter in his home
30:33
has been subject to last minute court cancellations and an absolute lack of effort to resolve this matter so I can
30:40
finally resolve my child custody case the message was clear stop investigating
30:45
tips related to the DA’s office and I want to say be clear they never offered any form of plea bargaining for three
30:53
years this was done to force me to go to trial so which one could have his revenge on me all right back to the
30:59
letter it defies belief that out of all of the assistant district attorneys who can be tasked with disposing of a Class
31:06
B misdemeanor from someone with no criminal record that the head of white-collar crimes happens to be
31:11
assigned to my trial witchell has placed himself in a position where he can finally seek retribution for my
31:17
reporting on the two Carroll School Board indictments that singularly served the interests of himself the recipient
31:23
of district attorney Wilson’s endorsement for County Judge our magazines reporting on the trial of
31:28
Jackie Wright has similarly maligned the reputation of Wilson whitchell and the public Integrity unit both bodies of
31:35
reporting made me a finalist for a First Amendment award and Diamond award attached you will see links to my
31:41
articles on witchell our newspapers reporting on D.A Wilson are well known so I’m not including those links in June
31:48
2019 I’ve documented obstruction of justice on the part of assistant district attorney Alfredo Valverde and
31:54
Bots attempts to cover up those actions basically the da went out of the way to fabricate these criminal charges in the
32:01
first place and that could be its own story um I should not be the subject to retribution or intimidation for
32:07
exercising my rights as a U.S citizen to file sworn complaints tied to those Acts or as a journalist following news tips
32:13
wherever they lead so anyway that’s uh that’s Lloyd witchell and that’s at this
32:18
attorney’s office way of trying to seek revenge on a news reporter so
32:25
yeah what do you hope comes from this I mean I I appreciate you telling your story what are you wanting this to
32:31
become you’ve worded on it you’ve published it you’ve talked about it here with us what is your what is your
32:36
desired outcome if there is one again I I um you know my trial was was closely
32:42
followed by a lot of people and a lot of attorneys were very interested in it and when when Lloyd lost it was considered a
32:50
big victory for um you know for justice and integrity in Tarrant County my
32:56
one one of the reasons I’m I’m focused on prosecutors and I’m talking to you on your show today is that again I I think
33:03
prosecutors are not scrutinized um to the levels that they should be
33:08
they have incredible leeway on uh whether they fabricate uh criminal
33:14
charges knowingly uh withhold evidence uh willfully keep people facing charges
33:20
who they know are innocent for purely political and Petty reasons and and so we have an honest understanding of the
33:28
role that they can play um the in creating injustices in our system we’ll never have a system that
33:35
works for the people is the journalism that you’re speaking of is that the way that to keep these folks honest
33:41
is that how this how these guys get kept in check that’s one way to do it um they
33:46
have incredible levels of immunity so they can commit things that would be considered criminal acts in the line of
33:52
their their work and uh they’re immune from it just like judges are so until there are reforms that allow uh
34:00
prosecutors to be uh prosecuted um or disbarred more easily
34:06
um they’re never it’s very unlikely that of their own volition they will do the right thing simply because
34:13
um I’m exposing them I wish that that were enough um that public sentiment were enough but
34:20
there needs to be there needs to be meaningful reforms um that allows that causes prosecutors
34:25
to understand that they can get in trouble they can not only lose their job they can go to jail um for this the types of misconduct that
34:32
we’ve discussed today do prosecutors get prosecuted ever I can’t think of you
34:39
know if they if they go if they pull out a gun and shoot someone to court I guess they would get prosecuted but if they do
34:45
anything in their capacity as uh prosecutors um even to the extent that they
34:51
um you know withhold evidence at least to someone being executed or you know and stuff like that has happened
34:57
um they’re never as so much as sued you know they’re they’re completely immune from anything and in what career in what
35:04
other job can you name if someone screws up rurally that they have absolutely no
35:10
there’s absolutely no accountability so that’s that’s something that’s very unique to prosecutors judges and
35:18
district attorneys in this show Eddie sometimes yeah yeah sometimes I think
35:23
it’s reflective actually of like our whole system right now not just in the
35:28
public sector but the private sector as well I mean I just think that we’re at a place in time where
35:35
um there’s maybe not a lot of accountability and I’m not saying that because I agree with some of the kind of
35:41
accusations you made here today I just um I do think you know
35:48
um uh it’s difficult uh to get good people
35:53
in good jobs to to continue to do things when there’s this much speculation you
35:59
know over so many things uh and their actions and things like that and in the government side of things it’s a very
36:06
open book or it should be on you know what they are I I think you know quite
36:11
honestly these things happen all throughout Society it’s just that there’s not the Freedom of Information
36:17
Act that a corporation you can’t go and say Hey I want a foia you at McDonald’s
36:22
for spitting in my burger I mean it’s just you know and and I think that that is where a lot of the degradation of uh
36:29
American government has gone is because of um the ability of going and just
36:34
fine-tooth combing everything I mean it it makes it real difficult you know and I’m and I’m not I hope you take that as
36:42
just oh yeah yeah sure you’re absolutely right there there’s an open records act for you know what happens at McDonald’s
36:47
but there’s a fundamental difference but between government and private business and there’s there’s regulations for
36:54
private business you know the SEC there’s ways to do that but we all have a vested interest in government because
37:00
that is um that’s that’s the ideal that that will either allow us to have our civil
37:06
rights or not McDonald’s is not going to meaningfully infringe on our civil rights McDonald is not going to falsely
37:11
jail us or uh shoot us you know during during a a traffic stop so you know I do
37:17
I do draw uh respectfully draw the distinction between the two and I think any government scrutiny is good and
37:23
welcome clearly you do my friend well Eddie thank you for sharing your thoughts here and and excellent work I
37:29
know you’re always looking for to do to do right with your with your investigative journalism so thank you for sharing it the best way we
37:35
appreciate you very much thanks for having me on we look forward to next time thank you for watching 42 thank you Captain thank you next time
37:43
foreign